Thursday, August 29, 2013

Movie Moments: The extraordinary life affirming moment in Schindler’s List (1993)

Rabbi on the left, Oskar Schindler on the right. (photo courtesy of latech.edu)

This movie moment is a favourite of mine because it is a life affirming moment that renews faith in humanity. (When I say humanity it is not an idealistic position. I am merely trying to say that for humans beings to make progress there must be some form of unity which would require some understanding of our humanity or what makes us human. Divisions are inevitable when there are those that seek to make progress at the expense of those stuck in the old ways) This is why all works of art must be life affirming or celebrate life because the life force is what binds us together and makes our achievements worthwhile.  When the life force takes shape it makes everything around it bloom and creates a form for its content as these various appearances make an impression on an objective reality altering it as the life force continues to spread. If I do have a religious belief it is in the life force that shapes us and makes us grow and so allows us to make an impression on whatever objective reality we encounter.

                In this movie moment the Jewish faith is rekindled and the fire of hope burns all thanks to a gesture by Oskar Schindler, the war profiteer. The objective reality up until this point is that the Jewish faith is all but extinguished as the Jews are brutalized with the intention that they will be annihilated by the Third Reich headed by Adolf Hitler. It is the close of another working day on Friday and the sun is setting as the Rabbi continues to offer his labour to Schindler’s armaments factory in Brunnlitz. There are other workers as well but they remove themselves upon Schindler’s unexpected approach. He approaches the Rabbi and asks ‘How are you doing Rabbi?’’Good Herr Director,’ responds the rabbi in a servile manner as he removes his cap. ‘The sun’s going down,’ says Schindler. ‘Yes it is,’ replies the Rabbi. ‘What day is this? Friday? It is Friday isn’t it?’ ‘Is it?’ ‘What’s the matter with you? You should be preparing for the Sabbath. Shouldn’t you?’ Schindler takes a step back as he prepares to leave and says, ‘I’ve got some wine in my office. Come.’ The Rabbi is stunned as he and Schindler walk side by side amidst the forces of production in the factory and the other workers that are still at work.  The lighting suggests the sun  is going down as the working day comes to a close. In the background we hear the beginning of the prayer hymn of the Jews with the rabbi taking the lead. As he and Schindler walk side by side we see his silhouette continuously look up to the silhouette of Schindler in disbelief. Schindler is much taller of course but within the context of the war economy of Germany Oskar Schindler, member of the Nazi party, is a giant whereas the Jews are treated like fleas. This act of benevolence extended by this war profiteer to the rabbi is an unbelievable event based on the circumstances.

                The shot of the two silhouettes walking side by side cuts to a small congregation assembled for evening prayers. The Nazi soldiers in their barracks at the factory are stunned to hear this prayer hymn being recited. In the midst of the congregation are two candles at the centre of the table which are lit for the purpose of the ceremony. The flames of both candles contrast with the black and white atmosphere of the film. Hope has been rekindled. A faith has been restored.

                We also learn during this moment, as the rabbi recites his prayer, that Schindler spent millions bribing officials of the Reich and in sustaining his workers. His armaments factory was also a model of non production during the last months of the war.  The great amount of profits that he generated during the war, on the backs of cheap Jewish labour, was now being used to maintain those that brought him this great wealth. This massive expenditure would turn out to be a wonderful investment because the Nazis were defeated and most members of the Nazi party were seen as war criminals. Schindler’s investment in his Jewish labour force would put him on the right side of history i.e. the progressive side.


This is an amazing movie moment.

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Capital/Capitalism as a Social force


(image courtesy of altrapoint.com)



I am doing this post in order to briefly explain why I constantly make reference to the  capitalist mode of production in my analysis of films and various events. The primary reason for this is that Capitalism, which is the most influential mode of economic production in the 21st century, becomes a social force as a result by conditioning attitudes and responses by individuals within bourgeois society. Capitalism involves the exploitation of the members of the working class which subsists solely on their labour power in order to provide surplus value/unpaid labour time/profit for those few that own the means of production or capital such as the raw materials the machinery, infrastructure and the means to pay the wages of the workers/subsistence. This mode of production emphasizes high levels of labour productivity with the aid of advanced technology in order to produce as much commodities as possible for sale in the market. In America one cannot analyze films without making some reference, however scant, to capital as a social force. In some cases capital may be a secondary factor with the political aspect taking precedence however it is there in the context. One cannot understand America without having some basic understanding of capitalism. I am clearly revealing the influence of Karl Marx who stated that the mode of economic production conditions social relations.

I differ from a lot of critics on this basis for they emphasize the artistic aspect of a particular film without emphasizing its economic foundations. Idealism runs triumphant with some critics because they berate the filmmakers for not aspiring to a particular ideal associated with filmmaking. This ideal may be reflected in how we see the world based on class orientation or social background. The reality is that most films are conditioned by a particular perspective which is rooted in the mode of economic production and the various class tensions that arise from this mode of economic production. In my review of The Treasure of the Sierra Madre I challenged Roger Ebert who emphasized that film was primarily about character with the gold being a secondary factor whereas I emphasized that the dogged pursuit of gold in this film made it the focal point of the film which influenced the position taken by the characters. Without the material forces to influence the direction of characters then people normally appear insane in pursuit of a dogmatic virtue which in turns only estranges them from the socioeconomic forces at play. Criticism has also been made into a sphere of idealism as it becomes virtually opposed to the sphere of action or the people of action that engage with the material forces of production.

I admit that sometimes I have fallen into that trap and criticized films on the basis of triumphant idealistic visions of the greatness that the film could aspire to etc. This occurs when one judges based on the performance of other films in the past. Filmmaking is a difficult venture and it is difficult to get the production team working in a unified direction particularly as you intend to sell it as a commodity for consumption in the market. The more successful you are in the market the better your prospects and this is why I believe that some balance must be maintained between the integrity of workmanship and the desire to make it a lasting work of art. Most filmmakers would like to make a classic and some get carried away by the artistic element forgetting that it must be consumed by an average person. This is why the mode of producing the film becomes important i.e. the techniques involved in getting across a particular film. The fact that something has to be produced in a particular way in order to make it palatable suggests the mode of production is at work regardless of the fanciful elements on display. You need a well delineated script a director that manages the camera in order to capture the essence of the story, a good editor which will make the visual elements stand out etc.

In the modern day these production techniques are conditioned by the fact that filmmakers operate within a capitalist sphere where they are compelled to produce for consumption in the market.  Some critics must acknowledge this when critiquing a film. It is not just about the ideal associated with filmmaking and what makes it great but who it is catered for in the market. Not every film will be considered great on this basis but will be considered a success if it does well in the market which means that it conforms to the ideological basis of a particular group in society. No film can be universal on this basis for a film like The Tree of Life will not resonate with the individual more concerned with being entertained but will resonate with the individual that cherishes fanciful philosophical ideals about the origins of life. The best films manage to create that balance between entertainment and the artistic element which normally emphasizes the grand philosophical element. The great films makes these two elements blend seamlessly. On the one hand you have the individual within a particular sphere of society however how that individual sees the world or interacts with it becomes the basis for his outlook which can be either positive or negative. The interactions of the individual are influenced by the ideological sphere in which he or she was conditioned by which is in turn determined by the material forces of production. In Taxi Driver (see my review) it is clear that Travis (Robert Deniro) is hell bent on confronting the social decay prevalent in capitalist society on the basis of ideals normally associated with the petty bourgeois/middle class who are the grand harmonizers within a capitalist society.

  Most of the great films that I review have some connection with the social sphere by emphasizing the mode of production within which we reside. The films I consider great emphasize this material element and have the individual react positively or negatively. My recently concluded modes of urban alienation series was one example where the material forces associated with capital compel the characters to act in a particular way either by embracing their circumstances or seeking to challenge them through some form of extraordinary endeavour. These films are also artistic in their own way because the perspective of individuals differ based on their conditioning and so they see the world a particular way and we are meant to see it as they would. There are cases when the filmmakers create an environment for us to inhabit but in fact it would not make sense if the characters themselves did not see this world in the same way. The challenge for the character(s) is whether or not they can expand how they see the world and challenge their perspective. It is difficult when you are conditioned by your social background.

When I review a great film I have been accused of making it too long. I admit this but I feel compelled to highlight the material forces behind the scenes in order to make the review more comprehensive. The material forces are normally associated with capitalism. This is not to say that capitalism is the only major social force. There are other modes of production that influence how people see the world. The feudal and  peasant based economies for instance influences how people relate to landed property. The slave economy is also tied into landed property with the slaves becoming a major social element in society and influencing the mode of interaction within society and the mode of economic production that underpins these interactions. See Spartacus (1960). Capital is the emphasis here because it is the economic production that influences how we interact with the world in the present day and this was as a result of the bourgeois revolution that first occurred in England and has now spread throughout the world. It is also the most advanced mode of production in history which emphasizes the increased development of technology in order to enhance labour productivity to produce commodities for sale in the market. When you watch a film today you see capitalism at work for if you simply trace the evolution of film you will see the various technological improvements. There can be no doubt on this basis that you are witnessing capitalism at work. The previous modes of production were stifled by triumphal idealism which is why the levels of labour productivity was low and technological improvements took years to come on stream.


This was just a brief discussion emphasizing why capitalism is at the core of my analysis when it comes to my film reviews.

Saturday, August 3, 2013

Modes of Urban Alienation, pt 4: Taxi Driver (1976)



  



Martin Scorsese says that Taxi Driver was presented as a ‘New York horror story’. This ‘horror story’ is accurate to the extent that it reflects the social decay prevalent on the fringes of bourgeois society where the cash economy is law as people desperately crave some measure of security by building up cash reserves by any means, legal or illegal, necessary. The urban alienation becomes more severe in such a case as one uncovers the contradiction in private property. Many people particularly, those of the working class or in the relative surplus population, that have to fend for themselves and put self interest before nation or the social collective good.

 Taxi Driver is both fantasy and reality. It is reality because as a taxi driver, that works all night and travels all over town, Travis Bickle (Robert De Niro) encounters the relative surplus population or those on the fringes of bourgeois society that are forced to fend for themselves by means that a comfortable middle class individual or petty bourgeois would consider depraved or immoral even if it pays the bills. As a fantasy we see Travis Bickle become a force onto himself as he seeks to impose his judgement on the so called scum that surrounds him. He is judge, jury and executioner as he goes on a murderous rampage in an effort to save New York City. It is a delusional crusade because he clearly has no understanding of the economic structure headed by the bourgeois class. He cannot comprehend the laws that would facilitate the creation of such an immoral class of individuals. He cannot fathom the necessity that comes with the formation of the mob economy on the fringes of bourgeois society and that it is motivated primarily by the need to acquire cash in order to spend so as to secure a livelihood. It is clear that the depressing conditions located on the fringes of bourgeois society have turned Travis into a warped idealist who believes he can radically alter the mode of production he encounters on the fringes of bourgeois society. He clearly is not of aware of what is involved in altering the system i.e. a significant class consciousness on the part of the proletariat in order that it is united in tackling the hegemony of the bourgeoisie that has established its hegemony through the various political institutions.  It is never the calling of one individual idealist crusader to embark on an expedition that will only resolve itself in sensation and nothing more; we see that by the end of the film that Travis becomes a celebrity but being a celebrity is not enough to effect change. Change comes about through a particular class creating hegemony through the state or by revolutionizing the state and its functions that previously served the interests of the ruling class. The fact that Travis does not understand this make him appear crazy but by the end we see that the sensation he caused was enough to generate a small following. He was targeting the wrong element for the mob is only a negative manifestation of the relative surplus population that is forced to fend for itself and so the mob itself cannot be the main reason for the gross inequalities inherent in the U.S capitalist system. It is on the basis of the few who control the means of production and the working class that comprises the majority is forced to sell their labour power and generate surplus value/unpaid labour time for the few.  The state is also a manifestation of the principles necessary to manage the capitalist mode of production. Travis must be classified as a modern day Don Quixote. This is why it becomes a tragic-comedy as well as a horror story because of the glorious absurdity that has deadly consequences.

Travis is clearly alienated by the urban condition. He is surrounded by a sea of  people and still feels all alone. His dramatic acts of violence are a means to reach out and be noticed and it worked. Taxi Driver is reflective of that element associated with urban alienation where people in the cities desperately seek to reach out in order to feel like they belong and this means of reaching out normally involves the creation of a celebrity that is well known by the public. In order to reach out you too have to assume the same position of this celebrity. This is done through several means and America is the haven of celebrity and emphasizes the extent to which alienation is rampant in that nation where people desperately engage society in order to be noticed. It is true that celebrities also function in the sphere of the circulation of commodities as their face or image becomes important for the purpose of marketing products for the top companies. The creation of a celebrity cult is done through legitimate means such as the arts and sports or through illegal and convoluted means such as sensational controversies such as the violence of Travis Bickle in this film. By becoming  a celebrity you will reach out to people for good or for worse and it will ease the burden of alienation. The alienation must be heartfelt for Travis who seems to be from a rural background according to screen writer, Paul Schrader.

This film basically centres on a discharged marine, Travis Bickle, seeking some solace in the urban setting of New York by becoming a taxi driver. By becoming a taxi driver at nights he comes to grips with the social decay inherent within this great capitalist city. Initially he simply expresses his disgust at the so called scum he observes at night but after failing to reach out and cement a meaningful bond with Betsy (Cybil Shepherd) Travis turns to other more brutal means in order to establish meaningful connections. This is why he decides to rescue a 12 year old prostitute, Iris (Jodie Foster), from her pimp, Sport (Harvey Keitel), in a great moral crusade against the social degenerates of society represented by the mob. Taxi Driver was nominated for 4 Academy Awards: Best Picture, Best Actor (Deniro), Best Supporting Actress (Jodie Foster) and Best Musical Score (superb score by Bernard  Herrman). It did win the Golden palm award at the Cannes film festival.

‘God’s Lonely Man’: A Taxi Driver in New York City

When we first meet Travis Bickle we meet a very obscure individual and perhaps this is the intention of the writer, Paul Schrader. This obscurity further relegates Travis to being another unspecified individual in New York City. When he goes to apply for a job as a taxi driver it is clear that it is a pretty straightforward application process. The manager/supervisor asks him basic questions but one should take note of how Travis answers these questions. He asks Bickle why he wants to hack and Bickle says he can’t sleep nights. He also rides the buses and subways at nights aimlessly and so he figured that he might as well be paid for it. The manager informs him that if he can’t sleep there are porno theatres that could help him. The implication here is that some people, particularly men, go to these theatres to jerk off/masturbate so as to crave some form sexual closeness that would make them feel at ease and make them more likely to go to sleep having filled  some void. This was a prominent theme in Annie Hall (see part one of this series) where Alvy would use sex as a means of establishing a connection. Travis tells the manager that he has already tried the porno theatres with no success. It is clear what this insomnia signifies because with this urge to reach out and belong one can become too anxious and agitated in the process. The closest connection among human beings is sexual activity. Other questions seem to condemn Travis to obscurity. For instance he is asked about his education background and his response ‘Some. Here, there. Y’know.’  He answers other questions similarly such as where he is from etc. One question stands out because of the answer and it is here that we gain some insight into Travis and his high handed moral attitudes. The manager asks him about his driving record and Travis answers by saying that it’s real clean ‘like my conscience.’ It highlights that nothing bothers him and he is a pure lonely soul. It truly is not important in a developed capitalist system (apart from your criminal record) where you are from  because what matters more is your skill as a  worker because that is what defines you and this is brought out in an important conversation between Travis and the Wizard (Peter Boyle). The extent that you as a  worker can sell your labour power to the capitalist is what determines your survival.  Travis offers to drive at nights all around town even through the Harlem ghettoes and on holidays. ‘Anytime, anywhere,’ says Travis. He is supposedly physically healthy and aged 26.  It is discovered by the manager that Travis was a marine, honorably discharged in 1973; he wonders why he would need this job. He wonders if Travis wished to do moon lighting (second job for purposes of more income. Off the record). Travis simply states that he wants to work long hours probably to keep his mind active.  His insomnia seems to be a feature of the loneliness and alienation he experiences in the city. The alienation itself does not at first seem imposed particularly as we see Travis try and reach out to people with little or no success. Travis is told to fill out some forms and to come again tomorrow ‘when the shift breaks.’

                Travis eventually gets the job and it is clear from his diary that this is one means of soothing his feelings of alienation.  He says ‘May 10. Thank god for the rain which has helped wash away the garbage and trash off the sidewalks (whores, gangbangers etc). I’m working long hours now. 6:00 in the afternoon to 6:00, sometimes 8:00, in the morning. Six days a week, sometimes seven days a week. It’s a long hustle but it keeps me real busy. I can take in $300, $350 a week, sometimes more when I do it off the meter.’

                We eventually get to see Travis on his trek through the streets of New York City at night. His 
isolated point of view from a taxi cab allows him to pronounce his judgments more readily. The taxi cab flows through the city and the impersonal nature of it, with so many similar yellow cabs, makes Travis even more anonymous. It is different in Jamaica where the robot taxis customize their vehicles in order to attract customers. The individual nature of the taxi cab stands out more in this case because there is not sufficient capital in Jamaica to control the multitude of taxis, individually owned, on the streets as is the case in America.  Travis pronounces his judgments when we first see him  in his new job as a taxi driver. Travis says ‘All the animals come out at night. Whores, skunk pussies, buggers, queens (homosexuals), fairies, dopers, junkies. Sick, venal. Someday a real rain will come and wash this scum off the streets.’ He is truly a high handed moralist, probably a petty bourgeois that seeks to maintain moral integrity in light of social degeneration associated with the relative surplus population created by capital. He is assuming the  religious dogmatic view associated with the Sodom and Gomorrah phenomenon in the bible where god struck down those so called depraved sinners. For the moment however there is nothing wrong in his judgments for many think this particularly those that assume a self-righteous position associated with their idealistic stance. Idealism is also a primary feature of individual loneliness particularly when the isolated person tends to cast judgment on the multitude as if he or she is privy to special knowledge/the ideal that we all aspire to which allows that person to cast down judgment.

                Travis is still a relative unknown as we watch him journey, for the first time in the film, through the streets. His schedule includes most of New York City at night. It is made clear in the film that most of the other taxi drivers are unwilling to take such a risk because of the danger when the ‘animals come out at night’. Travis makes it clear that he goes all over . ‘I take people  to the Bronx, Brooklyn, to Harlem. I don’t care. Don’t make no difference to me. It does to some. Some won’t even take spooks . Don’t make no difference to me.’ After this statement we see him suddenly pick up a white collared individual with a black prostitute. The white collared man can’t wait to do special things to the black sex worker. We see how impersonal Travis must be in his job because for all his judgment calls he can’t comment from a moral perspective on the activities in the cab as the man tells him to hurry up. It seems as if it is true that Travis does pick up everyone because Travis states that sometimes he has to clean the ‘come’ off the seats and sometimes the blood. It shows the disregard that people have for the profession of a taxi driver. The driver represents a mere vehicle that might as well be robotic. This also reflects the impersonal nature of society and the extent to which this profession is alienated within the urban context due to the individualized nature of  the society built on the foundations of private property. Even the Wizard felt compelled to intervene in a dispute between a homosexual couple after they started the dispute within the cab. He told them that he understands that America is the land of the free but he won’t tolerate their behavior in his cab but cannot judge them on the basis of what they do in their private dwelling. The fact that he had to make a statement suggests the disregard passengers have for the taxi drivers. Assuming a high handed moral position will undermine your position as you seek to interact with individuals. Capitalists promote free trade and with that everything becomes free particularly as the naked cash economy becomes ascendant.  Free within the context of the market. Lifestyles are embraced regardless of how disgusted some might be simply because these people with alternative lifestyles are a part of the market and once they have their money to pay for your product who are you to judge.

                The rounds by Travis in his taxi cab are not remarkable apart from his ranting and the unusual circumstances in which he finds himself as a taxi driver. Two females however change his perspective and force him to interact with the society he despises. Firstly there is Betsy (Cybill shepherd), a stunning beauty, who we first see in a slow motion picture shot which is from Travis’  perspective as he studies her movements outside of Palantine headquarters. He states that her beauty makes her standout out from the crowd as much as it makes her aloof. In his words ‘She appeared like an angel. Out of this filthy mass she is alone. They cannot touch her.’ It is ironic that his desire to reach out to someone like Betsy is on the basis that he wrote in his journal, in the previous scene, that one should not devote him or herself to ‘morbid self attention’ and that one should endeavour to reach out and become a person like other persons.

                The other female is a 12 year old prostitute, Iris (Jodie Foster),  who one night tries to escape in Travis’ taxi, while he is counting money, but is thwarted by her pimp Sport (Harvey Keitel). The pimp remains anonymous, because we don’t see his face at first, but he is remembered by Travis because he tosses a $20 into the cab while telling him to ignore the incident as he drags Iris from the taxi and into the street coaxing her with aggressive gestures, which is how pimps act when dealing with wayward prostitutes from whom they extort surplus value/unpaid labour time.  When Sport tosses the $20 it highlights the naked cash economy that develops under capital which has no moral scruples. A man can do heinous things but can buy you off should you be a witness. This naked cash economy reinforces the precept that money rules the world which is fallacious because in the modern day context it is Capital as a socio economic force that rules the world. Capital as a social being that valorizes itself by extracting surplus value from the working class. Money is an expression of this domination. 

                At first Travis is not interested in a grand crusade when he first encounters Iris because at the time he was busy trying to court Betsy. Betsy represents his attempt to reach out and to become one with the world whereas Iris stirs in him his grand plans for a crusade. With Betsy he musters the courage to ask her out to eat and although he displays his various eccentricities when they have their first conversation he is making progress particularly as he is able to convince her to go on a dinner date.  We see in the first lunch that he is too eager to reach out because he makes strange comments which highlights that he watches and studies her intently particularly as he reveals his disgust for her workmate, Tom (Albert Brooks) which hints at intense jealousy. On their second outing together Travis reveals his main flaw of complete isolation. It is those people that are socially isolated that react with passionate emotions particularly as they start to open up. He is so isolated that he takes Betsy to watch a porn flick. She is offended but cannot understand that Travis is inept when it comes to reaching out socially. He assumed that because he likes porn everyone likes porn. Betsy is a petty bourgeois and as a stately, beautiful woman she sees porn as the filth from which her ideal of womanhood emerges. She says that by taking her there it was as if Travis was merely saying ‘Let’s fuck.’ That is the reality of relationships in the urban setting where people become isolated and crave sexual intimacy. The porno theatres help to ease that burden. Travis says he does not know any other movies and that if he did he would take her. It is all in vain because Betsy leaves him standing on the curb. By focusing solely on porn theatres he never took the opportunity to explore other avenues of entertainment and this possibility was hampered by the fact that he is alienated and lives in his own little world. Your fantasy is not necessarily that of the other individual.  Diversity is part of the whole and so the more social activities one engages in will make them more in tune with the whole social body.

Betsy seems to be his last chance to reach out meaningfully because when she scorns him the only way out seems to be in his fantasies. It is here that he takes up the crusade of purifying New York City.

  Preparation for the Crusade

There are several moments in the film that prompt Travis into launching a grand moral crusade on New York City. Firstly his repeated attempts to reestablish a connection with Betsy are futile. They become so futile that Travis confronts her at the campaign headquarters of Charles Palantine. He whines with pathetic agitation as to why she does not return her calls until her workmate tom escorts him out. Before he leaves however he makes a crucial statement that is in keeping with his high handed moral agenda. He says ‘You’re in a hell (urban blight perhaps), and you’re gonna die in a hell like the rest of them!’ He eventually concludes that Betsy was no different from the other individuals of New York. She is just as cold and distant. He would round her up for judgment like the rest. This episode withBetsy would be one way to drive him off the edge.  The second episode appears isolated but is a significant one and I am sure that it is an important encounter that would push travis  to be more committed to the crusade. While out driving his cab he picks up and encounters a crazed husband (a wildly rambling Martin Scorsese). He encounters him because the man asks him to stop the cab in front of an apartment complex so that he may observe his  wife engaging in a sexual liaison in a apartment that belongs to a  black man ( the man refers to his competitor as a nigger). He tells Travis to keep the meter running because he will pay for it. This is another emphasis on the naked cash economy that develops under capitalism and on the fringes of society. Regardless of his crazy behavior he plans to pay for having the cab parked idly by the roadside apparently inactive but brooding with vitality.  The man concludes that he is going to kill her. Travis eyes him and the man assumes that it is because he is perceived to be crazy but in reality Travis must take some form of inspiration from this crazed individual. The man even reveals that he will use the magnum to blow away the woman’s pussy. He is clearly judge, jury and executioner. 

Thirdly, Travis seeks advice from the Wizard after doing his rounds.  He tells the wizard that he really feels like doing something because he is unable to handle the stress anymore. He has bad ideas in his head. This means that he is almost at boiling point. His emotions are going to boil over into reality which tends to have a devastating effect, right or wrong. The wizard senses that something is wrong  with Travis he senses that Travis might be losing it but not completely and so he tries to reel him in. Even before the conversation we see Travis stare intently at the blacks roaming the street at night. As a racist he seems to be spellbound by the blacks whom he views as a chaotic, dissolute set. The blacks in New York City are largely marginalized in the ghettoes and so it goes back to the point that the crusade that Travis embarks upon is quite foolish because he has no understanding of the system in which he resides but sees its negative manifestations and so tries to cast judgment on the people but not necessarily on the system that fosters the dissolute characters he despises. The  wizard tells Travis to relax, get laid etc and not to put too much on his brain i.e. let it go and become one with others instead of fostering this isolation in which he resides. He assumes that it is because Travis is stressed out by the taxi driving job, particularly the night work. In the film there are conversations where the taxi drivers share their negative experiences and the likelihood that they will be attacked and robbed, particularly at night. This is why one of the drivers offers to set Travis up on someone who can supply him with an arsenal of firearms in order to defend himself.  Travis, on the other hand, has other ideas for what he intends to do with this arsenal.  The wizard says something that strikes at the heart of capital and the predicaments of the working class. He says ‘A man takes a job… and that job becomes what he is. You do a thing and that’s what you are. One guy lives in Brooklyn.  One guy lives in Sutton place. You got a lawyer. Another guy’s a doctor. Another guy dies. Another guy gets well. People are born. I envy you your youth.  Go on get laid, get drunk. You got no choice anyway. We’re all fucked. More or less, ya know.’ Travis concludes that the advice is the ‘dumbest thing he ever heard’. It is dumb to him because it is the talk of a pacifist not a real extreme moral activist.

Fourthly, Travis runs into Iris again in the marginalized sections of the city which are mostly depraved areas of the proletariat or those on the fringes of society. He almost hits her as she attempts to cross the street. He takes a keen interest in her this time and even follows her for a bit until she loses him having observed him following her. After he leaves he writes in his journal ‘Loneliness has followed me my whole life, everywhere. In bars, in cars, sidewalks, stores, everywhere. There’s no escape. I’m god’s lonely man.’ He laments that the days go on and on with no let up and with one day ‘indistinguishable from the next.’ These are the rounds of the working class as they are continuously exploited. He notes however that the days go on and on until there is a change. The change comes when he takes up his associate taxi driver on the offer to buy guns. He buys a lot of guns including a .44 magnum and ensures that he has adequate practice.  Travis is now ready to take on the scum of the city.

The Crusade in Action

After he buys the guns and outfits himself in true military fashion Travis states ‘The idea has been growing in my brain for quite some time. True force. All the king’s men cannot put it back together again.' He outfits himself quite spectacularly particularly with a device that can make a  small gun slide out from beneath his long sleeve should he require It urgently in the heat of battle. He also has a big, green khaki jacket that can conceal all the weapons beneath. We even hear Travis saying that too much sitting has ruined his body. He plans to do 50 push ups a day and seems to toughen up by placing his clenched fist over an open flame. Despite all this he still pops pills to stay sedated perhaps. It’s  a conflict between the crusader seeking to reach out and the reality of a sedentary life characterized by his work as a taxi driver. Travis begins by scouting a rally being prepared for Charles Palantine, a senator with presidential ambitions. It is not entirely clear why he wishes to assassinate Palantine however Betsy does work for him on his campaign trail. He probably wishes to lash out at Betsy by killing Palantine or he feels that by killing Palantine he will gain popularity whether it be famous or infamous. He will gain notoriety regardless. He did have a conversation with Palantine in his cab before he and Betsy split. He even offered to join the campaign organization with the hope of meeting Betsy and making a difference on her behalf.  He even put a sticker in his cab endorsing Palantine. When Palantine enters the cab Travis lets off a little steam by saying that the city needs to be cleaned up and that he scum must be driven from the streets etc. He has faith that Palantine will be the man. As soon as he and Betsy split unceremoniously he wishes to kill Palantine and so it is likely that he is lashing out at Betsy and the hell she lives in. Maybe Palantine was all talk as most politicians who are not prepared to use the necessary force to get things done. Travis will hope to kill him and become his own force in society. This a planned attack on Palantine would be in keeping with the turbulent political environment in America during the 1970s.

While scouting the rally for Palantine Travis is using this reconnaissance mission to identify the potential threats that will stand in the way of his target. He identifies a tall man in the crowd with shades standing aloof from the crowd. Travis toys with him by asking questions in order to determine whether or not he is a service man. The man is clearly a member of Palantine’s bodyguard entourage. After identifying that he is a service man or a bodyguard Travis even offers a false name, Henry Krinkle, and a false address with the false intention of signing up for the secret service. The secret service man suspects Travis which is why he pretends to cooperate however his team are unable to take a photograph of Travis for purposes of identification in case he should actually attempt something heinous. Travis was found out but at least he was able to identify those individuals that would stand in his way. He was also identified and so that would explain why, when he returned to assassinate Palantine at another rally, he shaved his hair with a Mohawk style.  

Travis also gives his famous ‘You talkin’ to me’ monologue in his room. It is significant for Travis because he is pumping himself up for when he actually has to go out there and challenge people in direct physical confrontation. The monologue reveals a man dominated by fantasies and illusions. It is these fantasies that help to fuel his crusade however i.e. give it impetus. Immediately after this monologue we see Travis encounter a black robber in a grocery store. He kills him with one of his guns. The black robber looked like a true dope addict who desperately needed the money in order to buy more drugs. The store owner is relieved by Travis’ action and so in such an instance it appears that Travis has done a good thing. He helped the store owner to defend his property and within the scope of bourgeois society this is a legitimate action because Travis is defending private property. This is in no way related to his maniacal crusade in which he imposes his ideals and morals on others. This action of defense has nothing to do with crusading but a natural action of someone defending private property.  This heroic act does give Travis the impetus he needs however because now he has actually engaged the scum of society and for the moment has come out on top. It is not only talk with him anymore for he has actually done something and made some form of difference in society. America has always prided itself with the actions of citizens who defend their own property and this is why the access to guns is so easy. The defense of private property is seen as a virtue in bourgeois society which has developed private property social relations to its most developed state in human history.

We still see Travis observing the various Palantine rallies in New York City. He still sits in front of the TV but nothing seems to be happening. He cannot seem to commit to his crusade as yet despite the defeat he handed to the black robber in the grocery store.  He even writes to his mother and father for their anniversary and tells them lies about his life in the city. In the letter he seems to be leading a normal life where the opposite is happening in real time. It seems that he gets a jolt when the TV is broken after it crashes to the floor. He was watching a soap opera and rocking with his foot. It seems that it was a good thing to jolt him out of his fantasy.

He now starts to engage with his wild ambitions. After the episode with the TV we see him set up an appointment with Iris. He gives her the impression that he is looking for action.  He has to go through her pimp Sport and Travis does have a point when he says that Sport is scum. Sport has a humorous exchange with Travis because he assumes at first that he is a police officer because of his overly serious demeanor. Travis tries to convince him that he is hip but Sport says ‘Buddy you don’t look hip.’ It is a laugh out loud moment to see Travis try and convince Sport that he is hip when in fact he is as stiff as a board. It highlights the extent of Travis’ alienation in the urban setting. Sport is true scum as he hopes to exploit the labour of a 12 year old prostitute and Travis has every right to be disgusted. This is what Sport says about Iris as he hopes to market her qualities as a prostitute: ‘If you want to save yourself some money don’t fuck her cause you’ll be back every night for more. She’s 12 and a half years old. You ain’t never had no pussy like that. You can do anything you want with her. You can come on her, fuck her in the mouth, fuck her in the ass, come on her face. She’ll get your cock so hard she’ll make it explode.’ This is the same man who would later dance with Iris and try to convince her that he was still in love with her especially when she started to feel uneasy about her line of work. He is truly scum and a crass representation of the dark side of capital.    Travis takes the offer of $15 for 15 minutes. He also has to pay $10 for the room.  When he gets into the room Travis is naturally disgusted by the profession that Iris has to engage in. She desperately wants to make it, probably to please Sport whom she loves. Travis refuses to make it because he wants to remind her about the night where she tried to escape. Iris does not remember and insists that she was stoned. Travis continually asks Iris if she wants to escape and offers to help her. Iris insists that she can leave anytime she wants to but in reality she cannot because she is enthralled by her pimp. She insists that they were protecting her from herself by preventing her from escaping. She is clearly naïve but Travis does arrange to have lunch with her the following day where he would continue to persuade her to get away from this abysmal form of living. Travis even tries to make life seem more appealing by calling her ‘sweet Iris’ as he leaves.  Iris has been so used to being dominated sexually by men that a romantic gesture is more than likely to stir her young heart. 

When they do have lunch we get a clearer insight into the Iris’ character. At first, in the film, we see a prostitute but while at lunch with Travis we see a regular young girl caught up in the latest stylistic trends. Travis extends his invitation to help Iris to go back to her parents. She does not want to go back to them citing the usual childish explanation that they hate her and so on and it was this hate that made her escape. Travis reveals his traditional values when he says that a child should not live in the depraved area of New York which he calls a hell. A girl should live at home,’ he says.  Iris asks pertinently ‘ Did you ever hear of women’s lib?’ ‘What do you mean women’s lib? You’re a young girl. You should be at home now. You should be dressed up, going out with boys, going to school.’ ‘God are you square,’ says Iris. ‘I’m not square. You’re the one who’s square. You’re full of shit. What are you talking about? You walk out with those fucking creeps, lowlifes and degenerates on the street and you sell your little pussy for nothing man. For some lowlife pimp who stands in a hole? I don’t go and screw with a bunch of killers and junkies the way you do. You call that being hip? What world you from?’ Iris won’t believe that Sport’s a killer because he is a Libra. This is the naiveté that children acting older than they really are cannot escape. This by no means that Travis is correct when he says that Sport is a killer since he is just speculating based on the fact that he is a pimp in a hole. She goes on and on about signs when Travis states that Sport is a dope shooter. That is more believable. Iris then asks a pertinent question ‘what makes you so high and mighty? Will you tell me that? Didn’t you ever try looking at your own eyeballs in the mirror?’ Travis takes it in and then gets down to business when asks her what she plans to do with Sport and the old man that rents her room when she leaves. Iris has nothing but good feeling for  Sport since he never beat her up like he does with the other girls. Travis reminds iris that she cannot allow Sport to beat up other girls. ‘He’s the lowest kind of person in the world. Somebody’s got to do something to him. He’s the scum of the earth. He’s the worst sucking scum I have ever seen. You know what he told me about you? He’s calling you names. He called you a little piece of chicken.’ Iris says she want to go to one of the communes in Vermont. Travis says he cannot go not just because communes are unclean and the inhabitants are not his type of people but because he has work to do for the government. When he says work for the government he must mean the government he is trying to establish. He wants to wage his grand crusade. He offers her some money to go to the commune so that she can get away.

The conversation must have had some effect on Iris because she goes to Sport in a despondent mood complaining about her lifestyle. He has to caress and smooth talk her so that she will accept her exploited status. It is calculated suaveness nothing more no matter how nice the music. Travis would have suffered a defeat here because this smooth talking by Sport to keep Iris in line was all that was needed to sway her from the path of moral sanctity offered by Travis.

Travis then attempts to assassinate senator palatine at one of his rallies. We see Travis reveal his Mohawk hair style for the first tie which will help to make him unrecognizable. After Palantine’s ‘We are the People’ speech Travis approaches him in the crowd after he steps down from the stage surrounded by his bodyguards. He is spotted and is forced to flee. This part of his crusade is over. The grand ambitions that were built up inside his head have been smashed. This makes him even more determined to defeat Sport and rescue Iris. He rampages through the streets with his taxi with fixity of purpose as he heads for Sport’s hole. He finds Sport, confronts him and shoots him telling him to ‘suck on this.’ The chaos has ensued and this is exactly what would have happened if he shot Palantine. Had Travis shot Palantine Taxi Driver as we know it would have been a different film. The structure of the film would fall apart or be forced to go in another direction. His attack on iris is certainly more cathartic. He blows off the hand of Sport’s crony, that normally rents Iris’ room, with his newly acquired magnum in a dramatic manner that emphasizes the extreme bloodletting. The echo of that one shot makes the whole building echo and makes Iris aware of impending danger. He is shot by sport in the neck where he receives a grazing wound. This grazing wound from the surprise attack surprises Travis and he responds by pumping Sport with a lot of bullets.  He also shoots the crony again and heads up the stairs. Travis’ next target is to head for Iris’ room.  While focusing on the crony who  clambers laboriously up the stairs saying ‘I’ll kill you. You crazy son of a bitch.’ Travis is then surprised by the real leader of the outfit who shoots him in the shoulder and forces him to drop his revolver as a result of the shock. This man must be the leader because Sport gives him tribute before Travis arrives and strides up to Iris’ room with authority. This is fortunate for Travis because he will be able to wipe out all of Iris’ exploiters in one place. Travis uses his fancy contraption to have another gun slide out from under his sleeve and so light up the leader of this outfit with bullets.  The man who charges for the room still attacks with his one good arm, as he muscles Travis to the floor, after which, Travis stabs it with his knife and then blows his brains out. Iris by now is completely shocked by the actions of this crusader. We see Travis try to kill himself but this does not work out and so he settles in the couch severely wounded amidst Iris’ sobs. It must be completely unreal. 
Even when the police arrive Travis lays motionless as if dead and puts his hands to the head in the form of a gun. The shock is there for all to see as Scorsese uses the camera from the ceiling to survey the bloodshed that has taken place. The neighbourhood is also shook up as we see from the crowds outside. Travis has finally gotten his release not through sex but violence and now he should be able to get some rest.  

Aftermath

Travis was severely wounded in the attack but he survived relatively intact. We learn from a grateful later addressed to Travis by her parents that Iris has returned home to Pennsylvania.  It must have been an enormous shock to her and reminded her of the hole in which she resides. At least he left her with some money. Travis is vindicated by the media who saw it as his successful duel with gangsters who must have attacked him. The bourgeois populace will always welcome any successful challenge to the mob which represents the dark side of capitalism. It is ironic that it is actually the other way around. Travis was the one leading the crusade. Travis, as a taxi driver, has achieved some level of celebrity status. This notoriety will now make him accepted by the populace and ease his pangs of alienation. I am sure Travis sleeps better at night. God’s lonely man has some measure of social standing in society and has been able to break down some of the barriers that kept him isolated socially. This is what celebrities achieve which ensures that they will have some stake in society as opposed to the average man/woman who is isolated and cannot hope to make a socio-political impact because there are no avenues through which he/she can express him/herself. The other option for the average person is to become a follower of the celebrity in the prime of his powers because the average person is average.


He even has some measure of reconciliation with Betsy who takes a renewed interest in him as she deliberately takes his taxi one night. This would have been the moment to achieve the sexual release he clamoured for initially with Betsy. It can be argued that the frustration he felt at not realizing this sexual release with Betsy prompted his violent crusade. The violent crusade made him connect with people in a gruesome manner but it was a form of release akin to the relief one feels after releasing sexual pleasures long dormant. This is probably why he parts ways with Betsy in such a cold manner. It is the other way around this time as he now has the power to make her feel socially isolated as he drives off ‘See you around.’ Although he gives a strange look  the cab is swallowed into the daily/nightly grind of city life. What does the look mean? Does it mean that he is still spurred on by Betsy’s beauty to take some form of action? It seems that the break off was not as clean as supposed because the look suggests that he is still attached however his story is now over. The final shot is quite artistic as the cab becomes one with the city. The taxi is its own character and this final shot shows it  being swallowed by urban life. In fact the opening shot and the final one coincide because in the beginning we see the taxi come into view through the smog and at the end we watch it go out. In the beginning we see that this anonymous taxi has a story to tell and by the end as it is swallowed amidst the hustle of urban life the story is now over.  We understand that the story is over. All glory is fleeting and so Travis would have to launch another crusade in order to stay relevant because no matter how big you make it the shroud of urban alienation always takes hold again unless you can reinforce your social stature. We saw how Palantine did it with his constant rallying and the violence of an unknown Taxi driver named Travis Bickle who led a moral crusade against the dark side of capitalist virtues.

This concludes my modes of urban alienation series