Saturday, December 7, 2019

Knives Out (2019)****/5: Great mystery film but some parts are a bit too convenient.

Image result for Knives Out
(photo courtesy of IMDB.com)


Knives Out is a scintillating murder? mystery while offering affective family drama with a comedic touch. The film is also well written and directed particularly if you are familiar with mystery films in general. With the great mystery films things are never what they seem especially as you start guessing. Even if you guessed who did it you still will not be able to figure out how because of the layered presentation and characters going in and out of the narrative. As usual there is a big reveal but this should encourage you to watch it a second time in order piece it together.  If it is a great film then many of the clues should be there when you watch it again. Also, it must be said that the issue of murder or suicide is one of the most engaging aspects in the mystery. The motive is also important and it is here that we get a sense of the wider family drama. It is a white petty bourgeois family dependent on the patriarch who is now dead.  The introduction of an immigrant nurse from central or South America gives the film a new edge as she pierces through the cynicism with her kind heart. In that sense it is fantastical and entertaining beyond what could have been a turgid portrayal.

This film is directed and written by Rian Johnson and features an all star cast. The stand outs are Daniel Craig, as private detective, Benoit Blanc; Ana de Armas as the immigrant nurse, Marta; Chris Evans as the spoilt grandchild, Ransom Robinson; Jamie Lee Curtis, as Linda Robinson;  Michael Shannon as Walt Thrombey and Chirstopher Plummer as Harold Thrombey.

Positives

The primary positive is the murder mystery and what it says about the Thrombey family in general. This becomes apparent when establishing a motive for the murder. The Thrombey family is mostly dysfunctional and a lot of it has to do with their dependence on the patriarch, Harold, who is now dead. Another crucial element is the immigrant nurse, Marta, and her peculiar revulsion of lying. She is portrayed rather optimistically as a pure soul in contrast with the practical cynicism of the Thrombeys. Obviously this mystery says a lot about white America and their relationship with immigrants in general. This makes it a timely topic especially when considering how things unravel towards the end. In the good old days this kind of mystery film would not have such an edge with a character like Marta. It would not reflect white America accurately when their position was more secure in their hold on the country.
The introduction of a character like Marta suggests that these white ensemble films will have to account for the immigrant element in some way. The immigrant is crucial to any social portrayal of white bourgeois America because it is now a defining element in their experience.  The film smartly makes this film about a family with a small fortune as opposed to a big one and so the issues regarding inheritance are not so grave. If billions were at stake instead of millions then it would be all out war and the film would probably descend, farcically, into a shoot out. The film can then be seen as a microcosm of white America at a turning point. The mystery and how it unravels merely brings this to the fore. The film would not have been so meaningful without these wider issues to discuss.

Negatives
The primary negative is the sanctified portrayal of Marta in this cynical world. I will not reveal how the mystery unfolds but her role in it and her kind heart seem too convenient for this  plot. It is not clear why she is singled out as an invigorating factor because she is just a good nurse and Harold’s friend.  The motives of the patriarch, Harold, are also not clear cut and although things are conveniently wrapped up at the end I was not sure of his own motives regarding Marta. He laid out this grand plan on his birthday but is it because of the old adage that the 1st generation produces and the second generation consumes. Something like that. In some sense he is responsible for the family being so dependent especially in his unwillingness to allow some of them to exercise their initiative and to thrive in some areas. It is also clear throughout the film that he uses Marta to solidify his last hurrah or middle finger to his family. How will she continue to navigate the cynicism despite what appears a somewhat triumphant end? In such a sense the emphasis on such a kind hearted Marta narrows the portrayal and limits what could have been said  without it becoming merely comedic.

All in all the presentation of this mystery is technically very impressive but I still have some reservations about the pure hearted intentions of Marta.