This film is good despite its limitations. It is good solely
as popcorn entertainment and one can imagine the discussions between groups of
teenagers and tweenagers (those in their early twenties) that will ensue in the couple of
weeks. ‘Did you see the hulk smash?’ or
‘the visual effects were awesome’ ‘the movie was really funny. I liked that
scene between Hulk and Loki.’ ‘the action was worth the money. I came to be
entertained and so I was. I would go and watch it again with friends.’ ‘What
are you doing tonight? You want to go and watch the Avengers?’ Discussions of
the sort will swirl for the next couple of weeks because of the genuine
entertainment value of the film. This film is hardly profound and is very
predictable however it does have moments of humour that compensate for the
lulls and whenever there is doubt the filmmakers ratchet up the action be it
with a brief confrontation or a couple aliens invading Manhattan. The film is
clearly American centric and hardly encompasses the worldwide struggle. The Avengers are not Earth’s greatest heroes
they are America’s greatest heroes. The political inspiration for Americans or
backward nations within its sphere of influence that incessantly kiss ass, is
clear to outsiders that are not too thrilled by the film. The 3D effects do add
some dimension and it is utilized effectively at points when it comes to the
viewpoint of the audience as well as the scale of the action that takes place
in the final battle. I must admit that the visual effects are pretty impressive
when one considers the scale of the action. In the end however the battle is
not as climactic because you eventually realize that it takes place within a
pretty confined space and even nuclear bombs are brought into the fray. It
would have been good if the film had some residual effect apart from the
avengers themselves which would demonstrate that the struggle continues. The
end of the film reminded me of other team movies with the most recent
popular hit being The Fast and the
Furious 5 (2011). In The Lord of the
Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001), to which a reference is made by
the all pervasive Tony Stark, the team clearly had a much wider struggle which
required three movies however in The
Avengers everything is wrapped up conveniently and so by the next film it
will be another alien threat and massive action. It would have been more impressive if the main villains in the
film were not so inept at tackling the Avengers particularly from a physical
perspective. The use of Loki raises some doubts about actually testing the
resolve of these mighty heroes apart from the army which appears flimsy. Even
then the movie concludes pretty simply and one realizes that it is not
necessarily about the story or making the film worthwhile or relevant for the
years to come but about putting these superheroes together and have them wage
battle thereby showcasing their power. That will always be good for the visual
effects team. Also there is no restraint on the visuals and the action towards
the end clearly gets out of hand simply because it has no meaning since anyone
with common sense will be able to predict the outcome. There is no reason to
cheer apart from when the Hulk gets going.
The film is basically about the avengers defending Manhattan from aliens associated with Loki, the brother of thor.
The film is basically about the avengers defending Manhattan from aliens associated with Loki, the brother of thor.
It is still a good film and it is clearly too big to fail
however the lack of profundity paves the way for the other side associated with
The Dark Knight Rises (2012). SO
there is the side that is more inclined to watch The Avengers with all its
thrills and spills and the other side that intends to delve beneath the surface
with The Dark Knight Rises (2012).
Each film has its own niche market and it is clear from my discourse that I
side with the dark knight however I know those that will explicitly prefer The Avengers for its entertainment
value as opposed to the profundity and sparseness of The Dark Knight Rises. I say sparseness because it is clear that in
this case the action has to be one with the story from a realistic point of
view and so it cannot exist unless there is justification for it and the whizz
bang cannot occur extensively without sufficient reason. To each his own and
the struggle continues.
What’s good about
this film?
Hulk Smash; the gadgets of Iron Man; the might of Thor’s
hammer; the leadership skills of Captain America; the archery of Hawkeye (not
Legolas); and the cunning of Black Widow. When the director Joss Whedon focuses
on their particular quirks or what makes them definitive the film is quite
impressive on a dramatic scale and the choice of Loki seems evident in this
regard when one considers that he is the god of mischief and tries to play them
off against one another. Much like in The Lord of the Rings where the
fellowship was threatened by the corrupting power of the ring that threatened the
cohesiveness of the group. The parallel is quite evident here and undermined
the film although the reasons for it were clear in the attempt to build a film
solely through characterization. The film does hold dear with these particular
quirks by having the so called heroes show of their powers sometimes in duel
with one another as well as in the final battle with aliens that clearly did
not have a strategy apart from ushering forth gigantic mechanized millipedes. The
filmmakers clearly sidestep some issues by bringing unfathomable mystical
sources into play: the tesseract (is that spelt correctly) which was featured
in the some of the films leading up to this extravaganza. In Captain
America: The First Avenger (2011) the Red Skull wished to use its energy
for world domination and in Thor (2011)
it was stolen or disposed (I can’t recall). This was very good despite its
bloated nature because the filmmakers clearly understand that energy is power.
Energy from whatever source, be it oil or the sun keeps mankind’s economies going
and I wish this issue was made more apparent on a more earthly scale apart from
the interest of galactic terrorists. This debate about energy makes the film
timely although it is sidestepped too often. When we are first introduced to
Tony Stark as Iron man, who represents capitalism, his first lines speak to
Stark industries working on creating clean energy sources through the arc
reactor technology. This is good and so with the tesseract at the heart of the
film (literally and figuratively) as its energy source the film, despite its
superficiality, does score high marks especially as it is energy that powers the
universe. Having such energy concentrated in a single nation or individuals
does bring the notion of power into question.
The visual effects are superb particularly for the scale of the final battle and a massive
destroyer that can fly. America’s economy is booming in this film lol. The
visual effects however are so pronounced and obvious there are not many unique
shots. The most unique would come from the 3D shots where the audience is
engaged by the final battle. We get a POV when a car is rolled over by an
explosion for instance. When Iron Man is being pummeled by knocks we understand
the stress of being attacked all round without being aware of the direction from
which the blows are raining.
The humour will keep some of the uninitiated from detesting
the film.
It is good to see Iron Man/Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.)
show a more heroic side because it was his lack of heroism and selfishness that
ruined Iron Man 2. Maybe they will
emphasize this in the third installment. The Hulk is clearly the star, along
with Iron man, and he has some hilarious moments particularly one with Loki and
in others where his simplicity and ultra testosterone come to the fore. The
Hulk is truly for the testosterone driven male audience. It is no surprise that
Tony and Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo) get along so well especially as the two
are scientifically inclined. It was also good that they included Black Widow
(Scarlett Johannsen) to diffuse the ultra testosterone on set.
The last good thing was the main dramatic moment in the film
devoid of superficiality. It is because of this dramatic moment that the team of
Avengers Assemble and it involves a character that has been ever present in the
previous films leading up to this and so it delivers in this regard. The moment
is callously manipulated by Nick Fury (Samuel Jackson) and so we go back to
square one however it does seem like a real turning point.
The film moves by pretty quick.
What’s bad about this
film?
The overwhelming superficiality and bloated entertainment
values are the film’s strongest and weakest points. The film seems to rely too
much on spectacle to keep going and so it becomes more about the characters and
how their powers can enhance the action rather than a story that would
encompass a wider struggle apart from the narrow minded American isolationist
diatribe about it bearing the burden of the world through its security
apparatus. The struggle takes place solely in America and one wonders whether
the film will serve as a rallying cry for America to regain its global
dominance for at the moment China looks like it will be the dominant national economy in the not so distant future. One also wonders whether the aliens
represent the Chinese; the US has always been concerned about China stealing
its technology through spyware etc and it is no wonder the company shield is in
charge as opposed to the army in times of war. That issue about China is pure
speculation on my part but the film is so American centric that, as a realist,
I will be seeking parallels in the everyday at every turn. The film clearly
lacks a dramatic impetus for they spend the entire film concerned about Loki
and then dramatically switch to the Alien invasion. This film should have had a
proper build up so as to anticipate the climactic battle but it is all so
hastily done that it just seems to come and go with no apparent residual effect
i.e. there is no bittersweet taste left in your mouth. The film is self contained and does not
permeate the real day to day living thereby making you reflect on your place in
the world.The Avengers survive the day so all is right with the world. There
were some issues addressing the hypocrisy of Shield but that too is watered down
after the significant dramatic moment that occurs in the film. It is all
watered down as people forget all about such zany dialogue about those who
serve and protect being corrupt hypocrites. Who cares about that let’s see some
action. It is all water under the bridge anyway.
There are some irreconcilable moments with regards to the
detective work of the characters particularly when it comes to discovering the
true intentions of Loki. One can just imagine how Stark came to his conclusion
about Loki and where he would be located. Loki himself is not as profound and
pretends to be mysterious but his encounter with the Hulk completely abases him
and makes him seem so insignificant it makes one wonder about the reason why he
was chosen as the main villain. We see him interact with some higher order but
their intentions should have been clearer apart from ruling the universe. It is
clear that they are in control of Loki but eventually he assumes the titular
villain role. The aliens eventually seem like power hungry zombies with no real
control over their thought processes. Batman Begins (2005) did this well when
it came to the hierarchy of villainy. They do not have an actual plan apart
from getting their hands on the tesseract. It is all flimsily done but there is
too much going on to focus on such frivolities right. We need to see Hulk Smash
some more. The film runs true to comic book fanfare and exaggerations. There is
no real investigation into whether or not Loki was just a pawn or not. He is
merely humiliated and by the end we do not get a sense of what is really out
there; in the next film about the Avengers it clearly does not matter which
aliens are invading.
The film exaggerates some things which are relatively puny.
The final battle that is so impressive in its scale takes place only in
Manhattan and is not as significant because as Earth’s mightiest heroes one
would think that it would be more of an international struggle. The Avengers
always seem in control of the battle and one never worries about them losing.
It is shocking that the Council instructs Fury to release a nuclear bomb on tiny
Manhattan. It would have been more
interesting if the battle was more
extensive thereby forcing the military to intervene alongside the
avengers and so nuclear
bombs might have to come into play. Imagine the alien ships actually coming
through the portal and there now be a genuine threat to America. The
battle is not as great which is why it would have been good if it was a case
where the battle had commenced early thereby giving the aliens sometime to
become entrenched in the city of New York and from there make their advance
across U.S cities. In the mix could have been thrown in some philosophy about
the inferiority of the earth’s citizens or the inherent superiority of the
force at hand and the example it intends to set for other planets which it will
conquer. All these things are mentioned by Loki but without the means to back
it up he is humiliated. The heroism of the avengers would not seem so flimsy
for when they do arrive on the scene after a few days or months of occupation
then it would resonate. But we cannot have that so the attack is rapid and the
aliens without a plan are bamboozled by the avengers and do not seem effective
for as drones they are not impressive. This has been the failure of most of
Marvel’s films of late and it is sad that they have to assemble the heroes to
create something meaningful. Individually one wonders how the movies for the
individual heroes will hold together. Who is Captain America going to fight? Or
Thor? It all seems so frivolous for the sake of shallow entertainment.
Also how in tune with reality is this film. America is now
going through a debt crisis and the economy is not growing yet Shield is
allowed to build a massive naval destroyer that can fly. Wow. It is good for
special effects and fantasy but what about reality. This is why the energy
question should have been explored more effectively. No wonder America has such
high levels of debt. Most of the characters are not as significant although
there is now the call for arrows to be put back into production thanks to
hawkeye.
After watching the avengers a second time i have come to the conclusion that it is worthy of an improved rating.
ReplyDelete