Thursday, November 1, 2012

Is the Apple Inc. bubble about to burst? Of course









Apple Inc. is the wealthiest company in the world by market capitalization currently with a value of around $626 billion for the year 2012. Market capitalization is determined by the stock price. A single stock in apple cost around  $700 in september. The revenues of Apple however were only $108 billion at the end of the year 2011. 2012 is not finished as yet but it is fair to say that it will remain between $100-200billion. These figures do not seem to add up and it is clear that there is a difference of $500 billion between the market capitalization value and the actual revenues earned by the company through its generation of surplus value from its workers whether in America or China. Apple has truly recovered from its decline during the 1990s. People tend to attribute this to the return of Steve Jobs to the company. Under Jobs apple came out with some innovative and well designed products such as the I phone, I pod and I pad; all were touch screen devices.  There is also the I tunes store that allows you to purchase music etc. Apple seems to exist in 2 worlds however because there are the numbers reflecting  actual production and the stock market vultures that have inflated the stock value by such a remarkable amount who hope to cash in on the 2.65 per share. The sales of Apple products are not vastly superior to its competitors such as Samsung and Nokia in the mobile phone and tablet market and Hewlett Packard and Lenovo in the PC market.  Apple benefits from its exorbitant prices which it can afford to charge because of its inflated stock value and the mania associated with its brand however with a difference of $500 billion eventually the idealists will be brought down to reality. The reality that the rate of profit will fall particularly as investment in the constant capital or the machinery that aids in the conduct of operations will take over more of the labour. I am not aware of the investments in its means of production and its labour however based on various reports particularly one done by the New York Times there seems to be the high quality engineers that design the product in or around Silicon valley and the workers in China that turn out the products cheaply so that Apple can meet the demands in the market particularly as it concerns a launch of a new product.  When the workers in the production process are cast out then growth will be retarded because a company like Apple must invest significantly in technology and raw materials to keep its operations going particularly in the US. The company has  production outlets for its products in China as it benefits from cheap labour however based on current production Apple will need to increase the amount of products it generates so as to be able to have them consumed in markets across the world and so increase its revenue. Moving to China is a logical step because it is home to 1.3 billion. They have also decided to release the I pad mini which is not necessarily much cheaper than the I pad. It seems as if Apple caters chiefly to high income individuals at the moment that are bamboozled by their product or the brand of the company but eventually it will not be enough if it intends to expand revenue in line with that inflated stock price. Further devaluation will be necessary; devaluation in this case being increased production and cheaper products. Apple still refuses to compromise the quality of its products however while they stay high handed others will eventually adapt to the new technologies and create even better models  at cheaper prices and this competition alone will make inroads into Apple’s dominance as a brand on the market which is reflected in market capitalization.
                There are missteps however such as the televisions that never took off, the death of Steve Jobs which many fear will precipitate the Apple bubble, the faulty maps released earlier on the new Ipads which forced Apple to tell their customers to use those of their competitors (Two of the executives responsible for the maps have been dismissed) and lastly the patent lawsuits with Samsung have dented confidence. Apple reportedly won a case in California against Samsung about patent infringement and won the case as Samsung were ordered to pay $1 billion however Samsung intends to appeal. There was also a turnaround against Apple where a judge overturned a decision that stated Samsung had infringed on apple’s patents and so Apple was forced to issue an apology. I have also heard that the new I pad is not radically different and is only an enhanced version of its predecessor. The I phone 5 seems to be doing well however but all of these events points to the inevitable decline because it is clear that Apple cannot keep up this mystique forever.  Apple always releases a new product ever so often and so once you buy its predecessor you are compelled to buy the current edition. This is how Apple keeps its goods in circulation at these high prices because people are not given time to settle with the product they currently have. This keeps their revenues up but always at the same level because when you count their market it caters primarily to middle and upper income groups. Their market share will not radically expand on that basis for even the I pad mini is much more expensive than the Google nexus 7 and the kindle fire.  Apple will never reach $600 billion in revenue on this basis. In the long term it is possible but it is safe to say that competition has caught up with them. The Apple mystique has not bamboozled some because when it comes to revenue Samsung and Hewlett Packard are wealthier companies and so all the hype about Apple has not translated into greater revenues because it is still behind its main competitors. What the hype has translated into is the market cap a little over $600 billion which is based on the possibility that Apple will soar into the future and create all these magic products that will dazzle the world. The fallacy is in the expectation because there is no guarantee that apple will be the next great innovator. I heard that they are working on a television now to make up for the mishap under Steve jobs. This is all good but it will not get them increased market share simply because they rely mostly on high income earners whereas Samsung and Nokia for instance have the expensive phone as well as the cheap phone for the man who will never buy a tablet much less an iPhone. 

                The market cap will be reduced eventually in line with revenues and the world will come to realize that Apple is not as great as once thought. Apple cannot hope to grow at such proportions estimated by the market. That has only been fueled by speculation on the stock market and so the bubble will burst particularly if it exclusively targets high income groups. Apple seems not to have understood that the majority of the world’s  7 billion population  is poor and lives in the gutter created by capitalist companies such as Apple and its competitors regardless of their sanitized brands that bamboozle, dazzle, befuddle and corrupt the minds of those people that have raised this company as if revering a god head but in time they will realize their folly. Apple even intends to buy up some of its own stock over a 3 year period which is a clear realization of the bubble in the making. Also a report on CNBC discussed this issue and Robert Van Batenburg  from St. Louis capital markets said that according to guidelines that regulate investment in stock on the S&P 500 there is 5% limit for investors in the particular stock of a company. With Apple’s inflated stock price that 5% limit in the S&P 500 will soon be reached and so people will soon be forced to sell their stock and then a devaluation of price will occur because according to Robert although there are many people buying into the stock  seeking cash payments there are not many sellers and so when the 5%limit is reached a lot of people will be forced to sell and so the stock will naturally devalue because it  has been cheapened. He was challenged on the basis that others will wish to buy the stock such as pension funds seeking annuity like payments but Robert countered by saying that 75% of the investors are mutual funds,  and trust endowments and the hedge fund owners are but a ‘small sliver’ and so the majority are buying in now to cash in on the high stock price. This means that these people are regulated by the extent that they can earn dividends on their stock so that they can earn cash payments. When the cash payment ceases, having reached the 5% limit, they will have to sell and invest elsewhere. They are getting returns on their shares right now on the basis of the revenues generated and so the issue still is how will Apple close the $500 billion gap even though it will still be one of the richest companies in the world by revenue should it pass the $200 billion mark.

The good thing about the inflated stock price is that it gives apple a lot of available capital to invest in research and development. This means that there is still the hope that they can come up with the next magical product however unless they increase market share all that money being invested in R&D will begin to evaporate as sales do not radically skyrocket.  As a publicly traded company therefore Apple relies on its brand to keep the money coming in but the reality is that revenues will never reach that high mark for even Exxon which is the richest company in the world by revenue, with over $400 billion in sales, has not reached that level. Apple will never close that $500 billion gap because it is close to reaching the extent of its market share which will be eroded by competition. This is not anything dramatic however for with the decline in the stock price at least Apple will not be pressured to please investors and will be able to spend more time on innovation as opposed to worrying about increasing sales which has led to the mishaps during the year 2012. What has made Apple great will eventually make it relatively small i.e. in line with its revenue base which is not mind blowing by any stretch of the imagination. A lot of people will lose money but as long as it remains a corporate issue then no feathers outside the exclusive Apple circle will be ruffled when the bubble bursts and things return to normal. The idealists who still believe in Apple’s promise will no doubt disagree.


No comments:

Post a Comment