Saturday, June 29, 2013

Movie Moments : Superman saves Lois Lane in dramatic style.



(picture courtesy of guy fortune.com)

This moment occurred in Superman (1978). In my opinion this film was good up until this specific moment where superman saved Lois Lane from the jaws of death in such a dramatic fashion. The superman films of the late 70s and early 80s  had very dramatic moments and it was an annoying trend. In Superman 2 (1981), for instance, superman gives up his powers for Lois lane, a mere mortal, while the world is at war with General Zod. He is humiliated by an average brawler in a diner when he is given a beaten and exclaims pathetically, after falling through glass, 'that's my blood.' He has to hobble back through biting cold winds to the fortress of solitude in a hope to recover his powers after he finally discovers that Zod is on the loose. I scoffed at this dramatic spectacle  but I tolerated it because it was not as excessive as the dramatic movie moment I am about to discuss. Although Man of Steel continued this tradition of dramatic spectacle it was not as excessive as the old superman films and for that i was thankful.

Now let's turn to this absurd moment. Lex Luthor (Gene Hackman) wants to destroy most of California so that it will increase the value of the barren real estate in his possession. He decides to destroy most of the area by unleashing two nuclear bombs and when one hits it creates a massive earthquake which engulfs Lois Lane and her car thereby killing her. Superman, on escaping Luthor's prison,  kept his promise to Luthor's Hench-woman to dismantle, first,  one of the missiles that headed to her hometown. He is, therefore, unable to save Lois especially as he has to spend time stabilizing the crisis that erupts when the missile creates serious tremors in California. When he finally discovers Lois he is distraught. The great absurd moment occurs when Superman screams out in frustration and flies up, up and away outside of earth's atmosphere. He recalls the voice of his biological father, Jorel (Marlon Brando), saying that he must not tamper with human history. Superman disregards this advice and pays heed to the advice of his earthly father Jonathan Kent, who says he must be on earth for a reason. Is the reason to save Lois Lane? If so then that is a quite pathetic reason. Superman then spins around the earth at such violent speed (mach- 1 billion) that the earth rotates in reverse  and time it self is altered as previous events come back into existence. We watch the absurd moment unfold as all the destruction created by the tremors is corrected and, most importantly, he saves Lois.

This movie moment is absurd because it places superman on a truly godlike pedestal. this man has so much power that he can make the earth spin in reverse. No where in the comics is he that powerful. If he were there would be no villain to match him with. There is also no realistic guarantee that if you spin around the earth at such violent speed that time itself will be reversed. If superman was so fast why did he struggle to get to Lois Lane in time thereby negating the possibility of her death at that particular moment.

This moment condemned Superman to ignominy long before Superman 3 &4. It is here that superman became the judge of the world hence his inevitable quest for peace and his embarrassing address to the United nations a couple years later. it is here that superman took on this great burden  of isolation which would never make him relatable. In Superman Returns (2006) he lifts an entire island  and tosses it like a sponge ball yet allows Luthor to kick him around thanks to a little kryptonite. This excessive display of power in Superman (1978)  ensured that that there was no possibility that superman would ever be seriously challenged hence why in Superman 3 he fights himself for good measure and only a nuclear man in Superman 4 can put up a decent fight which is really a no contest, apart from the nails.

Man of Steel has thankfully addressed this issue to some degree.



3 comments:

  1. Very good review, Karl. I however don't think much time was spent developing the plot in "Man of Steel." I think the producers tried to encapsulate too much in one film, for example, there was a bit on his birth on his home planet, then only flash back to show his transition into childhood and man hood. I didn't see how and when he fell in love with Lois. I was disappointed. I think the plot was weak. He didn't come off as super at all as he was handed a beaten on numerous occasions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree they should have been more focused in creating a set of objectives for superman and this was one of the weak points. Had they established what his true purpose was he would not seem like such a meandering individual. This is why the strongest point is the background of Krypton and the transition to Earth. They kept saying that Superman as to represent hope etc but it was not clear what he was to help resolve apart from being an alien with super powers. At least Nolan made it clear that Batman's primary objective was to rid Gotham of crime. I m still not clear about what superman represents in Man of Steel. This would have strengthened the plot and make superman more definitive. I agree with the other points which is why a linear tale would have been more acceptable when we finally see him take off. Nolan was behind the script so that would explain the flashbacks etc.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have to disagree about the fights because i liked that he had some competition.

    ReplyDelete